Yale University Press releases new Calvin biography

July 10 marks the 500th anniversary of the birth of John Calvin. On that day Yale University Press will release what some scholars are predicting will become the standard work on the life of John Calvin. Authored by Yale’s Professor of Reformation History, Bruce Gordon, the book presents Calvin from a perspective many admirers of Calvin will find unique.

I’m only about 25% of the way through my copy, so I will withhold a complete commentary until I’ve finished it. I will admit, however, to skipping ahead to the section that covers Calvin’s treatment of the heretic Michael Servetus. Suffice it to say that Gordon’s handling of the history around this controversial event makes it clear that he is approaching Calvin’s life dispassionately and objectively.

The book will be released on June 22, 2009. Read more here.

Calvin on God’s Hostility towards Man

The mode in which the Spirit usually speaks in Scripture is, that God was the enemy of men until they were restored to favor by the death of Christ (Romans 5:10); that they were cursed until their iniquity was expiated by the sacrifice of Christ (Galatians 3:10, 13); that they were separated from God, until by means of Christ’s body they were received into union (Colossians 1:21, 22). Such modes of expression are accommodated to our capacity, that we may the better understand how miserable and calamitous our condition is without Christ. For were it not said in clear terms, that divine wrath, and vengeance, and eternal death, lay upon us, we should be less sensible of our wretchedness without the mercy of God, and less disposed to value the blessing of deliverance.

For example, let a person be told, Had God at the time you were a sinner hated you, and cast you off as you deserved, horrible destruction must have been your doom; but spontaneously and of free indulgence he retained you in his favor, not suffering you to be estranged from him, and in this way rescued you from danger – the person will indeed be affected, and made sensible in some degree how much he owes to the mercy of God.

But again, let him be told, as Scripture teaches, that he was estranged from God by sin, an heir of wrath, exposed to the curse of eternal death, excluded from all hope of salvation, a complete alien from the blessing of God, the slave of Satan, captive under the yoke of sin; in fine, doomed to horrible destruction, and already involved in it; that then Christ interposed, took the punishment upon himself, and bore what by the just judgment of God was impending over sinners; with his own blood expiated the sins which rendered them hateful to God, by this expiation satisfied and duly propitiated God the Father, by this intercession appeased his anger, on this basis founded peace between God and men, and by this tie secured the divine benevolence toward them; will not these considerations move him the more deeply, the more strikingly they represent the greatness of the calamity from which he was delivered?

In short, since our mind cannot lay hold of life through the mercy of God with sufficient eagerness, or receive it with becoming gratitude, unless previously impressed with the fear of divine anger, and dismayed at the thought of eternal death, we are so instructed by divine truth, as to perceive that without Christ God is in a manner hostile to us, and has his arm raised for our destruction. Thus taught, we look to Christ alone for divine favor and paternal love.

John Calvin: Institutes of the Christian Religion, Book 2, Chapter 16, Section 2

Calvin on the Contrast Between God’s Virtue and Ours

“So long as we do not look beyond the earth, we are quite pleased with our own righteousness, wisdom, and virtue; we address ourselves in the most flattering terms, and seem only less than demigods. But should we once begin to raise our thoughts to God, and reflect what kind of being he is, and how absolute the perfection of that righteousness, wisdom, and virtue, to which, as a standard, we are bound to be conformed, what formerly delighted us by its false show of righteousness will become polluted with the greatest iniquity; what strangely imposed upon us under the name of wisdom will disgust by its extreme folly; and what presented the appearance of virtuous energy will be condemned as the most miserable impotence. So far are those qualities in us, which seem most perfect, from corresponding to the divine purity.

…[M]en are never duly touched and impressed with a conviction of their insignificance, until they have contrasted themselves with the majesty of God.”

From Institutes of the Christian Religion, Hendrickson: 2008, p.5 (Book One, Chapter 1, Heading 2)

Calvin on Church, State and Politics

From The Calvinistic Concept of Culture by Henry Van Til:

The impact of Calvin’s ideas in the political sphere inaugurated a new era, giving a new character and direction to national existence in many lands. The Greek state had been totalitarian, in which religion served as means unto an end, namely, the glorification of the state. In the Middle Ages the roles were reversed so that we find a church-state, with supreme authority vested in the pope, who loaned temporal power to the earthly ruler for the service of the church. Calvin saw the church and state as two interdependent entities each having received its own authority from the sovereign God. In this conception, the state is never secular, nor are state and church separated in the modern sense of the word.

According to Calvin, church and state must live in peace and must cooperate together in subjection to the Word of God. Each is to have its own jurisdiction. The state has authority in purely civil and temporal matters; the church, in spiritual matters.

It’s obvious from the above that American government is modeled more along the lines of the Greek state, with religion being nothing more than “civic” with the only end of serving the needs of the state for orderliness and ultimately its own glorification. Imagine a politician today actually believing that the collective authority he or she exercises is not ultimate, but rather “ordained of God” for His purposes. Modern American politcians certainly never give thought to the notion that there is a Higher Law upon which our Constitution is based. Remove that foundation – which secularists and liberals have been doing now for most of my life – and you have no Constitution left. When Law collapses, “the collective will of the people” prevails, and man becomes sovereign instead of God.

In his ideas about the political order, Calvin’s basic principle of the sovereignty of God is determinative. For he was strongly opposed to every form of state absolutism, autocracy, and absolute monarchy. Kings and presidents ought to have their power limited by legislators and constitutional law. Calvin cites the concrete case from Scripture of Samuel recording the rights of the people in a book for future reference between them and the king. This differs in toto from the social contract idea of Rousseau, in which the collective will of the people is the highest norm. For Calvin the sovereign God is law-giver of the nations today as well as in the days of Samuel, and popular sovereignty is a figment of the deluded imagination of fallen man.

John Piper wishes John Calvin a Happy 499th!

From the DesiringGOD Blog:

Happy birthday, John Calvin. Today we celebrate your 499th birthday. Your preaching inspires me to press on with this great and glorious task of heralding the Word of God.

T. H. L. Parker’s 1975 biography tells why:

And so we trace him preaching on Sundays with one hundred and eighty-nine sermons on the Acts between 1549 and 1554, a shorter series on some of the Pauline letters between 1554 and 1558, and the sixty-five on the Harmony of the Gospels between 1559 and 1564. During this time the weekdays saw series on Jeremiah and Lamentations (up to 1550), on the Minor Prophets and Daniel (1550-2), the one hundred and seventy-four on Ezekiel (1552-4), the one hundred and fifty-nine on Job (1554-5), the two hundred on Deuteronomy (1555-6), the three hundred and forty-two on Isaiah (1556-9), then one hundred twenty-three on Genesis (1559-61), a short set on Judges (1561), one hundred and seven on 1 Samuel and eighty-seven on 2 Samuel (1561-3) and a set on 1 Kings (1563-4).

Before he smiles at such unusual activity of the pulpit, the reader would do well to ask himself whether he would prefer to listen to the second-hand views on a religion of social ethics, or the ill-digested piety, delivered in slipshod English, that he will hear today in most churches of whatever denomination he may enter, or three hundred and forty-two  sermons on the Book of the Prophet Isaiah, sermons born of an infinite passion of faith and a burning sincerity, sermons luminous with theological sense, lively with wit and imagery, showing depths of compassion and the unquenchable joyousness of hope. Those in Geneva who listened Sunday after Sunday, day after day, and did not shut their ears, but were “instructed, admonished, exhorted, and censured,” received a training in Christianity such as had been given to few congregations in Europe since the days of the fathers. (92)

Thank you, John Calvin, for believing in the majesty of the word and for demonstrating by your life the glory of preaching the Bible.