Max Lucado on God’s Story, Your Story

Max Lucado is a Minister of Preaching at Oak Hills Church in San Antonio, where he has served since 1988. He has been married to Denalyn Preston Lucado since 1981, and they have three grown daughters—Jenna, Andrea and Sara—and one son-in-law, Brett.

Dubbed “America’s Best Preacher” (Reader’s Digest) and “America’s Pastor” (Christianity Today), Max Lucado is back with his only all-new book for 2011, God’s Story, Your Story: When His Becomes Yours (Zondervan, 2011).  This latest book helps readers to search for and discover the rest of their story. With a lyrical, soothing but solid approach to life’s most pressing issues, Lucado provides hope to the masses as he has done for more than 25 years. Teaching pastor at 8,500-member Oak Hills Church in San Antonio, Lucado is among the top evangelical leaders in America (The Church Report).

Paul spoke with Max Lucado on September 24, 2011: Max_Lucado_on_Gods_Story_Your_Story.mp3

Catholics becoming Protestants

Jesuit Fr. Thomas J. Reese, former editor in chief of America, a senior fellow at the Woodstock Theological Center at Georgetown University in Washington, has done a deep dive into the Pew Forum’s U. S. Religious Landscape Survey to reveal that one out of every ten Americans is a former Catholic and that one out of three people who were raised Catholic no longer identifies as Catholic. Of those who have left the Catholic Church, half have become Protestant and half become unaffiliated with religion.

Why are Catholics leaving to affiliate with Protestant churches? Sadly, not because of doctrine:

The data shows that disagreement over specific doctrines is not the main reason Catholics become Protestants. We also have lots of survey data showing that many Catholics who stay disagree with specific church teachings. Despite what theologians and bishops think, doctrine is not that important either to those who become Protestant or to those who stay Catholic.

People are not becoming Protestants because they disagree with specific Catholic teachings; people are leaving because the church does not meet their spiritual needs and they find Protestant worship service better.

It seems the mitigating factor in the decision to move from Catholicism is feelings and not truth:

…those who are leaving the church for Protestant churches are more interested in spiritual nourishment than doctrinal issues. Tinkering with the wording of the creed at Mass is not going to help. No one except the Vatican and the bishops cares whether Jesus is “one in being” with the Father or “consubstantial” with the Father. That the hierarchy thinks this is important shows how out of it they are. While the hierarchy worries about literal translations of the Latin text, people are longing for liturgies that touch the heart and emotions. More creativity with the liturgy is needed, and that means more flexibility must be allowed. If you build it, they will come; if you do not, they will find it elsewhere.

Read the full article at the National Catholic Reporter.

Rob Bell on WJR Detroit

Rob Bell continues to avoid conservative evangelical media, choosing rather to sit for brief interviews with personalities who no doubt have been vetted to ensure that another “Martin Bashir Moment” doesn’t catch Bell with his pants down.

On Monday, April 4 Bell spoke for 9 minutes to Detroit’s popular morning personality Paul W. Smith on WJR. While Smith made a pretense of asking one tough question, he completely let Bell get away without answering it:

Paul W. Smith: “Your “hell” would be “hell on earth,” not the traditional hell that’s supposed to keep us in line because we’re worried we’re going to hell when we die.”

Rob Bell: “You know, in the book I tell this story: There’s a woman I see each Sunday at church…each week she walks up to me, she hands me a piece of paper. The piece of paper is folded in half. And then she smiles and then she walks away and then I open up this piece of paper and on it is written a number. And the number is the number of days since she last cut herself. And she just recently celebrated one year without cutting herself. And so for me, I want her to know that she’s loved, that she matters. I want her to be a part of our church where she has people who are supporting her as she works through her wounds from the past and she experiences healing. So that’s to me, that’s the good news. She needs to hear it. I believe lots of people need to hear it. We have enough suffering in our world, and I think Jesus calls us to do something about that suffering to come along side those who have been kicked to the edges and try to bring some heaven to earth.”

Bell never answered the question. Paul W. Smith moved on to tell him how impressive his church is and to ask Bell about something Bell said to him off-air before the interview:

Paul W. Smith: “Now what is the original Christian message you were alluding to, because I’m not sure  what you meant?”

Rob Bell: “The central thing that Jesus announced to people was that God is on their side. This comes up again, again and again in Jesus teachings. He says things like, ‘God causes it to rain on the  righteous and the unrighteous,’ which is basically saying God is kind and good to all sorts of people, people who don’t even deserve it. So Jesus calls us to this fundamental gift of life that God has given us. And this God who created the world, who called the world good, is for us. This was Jesus’ announcement again and again.  And people in his day, there were lots of popular ideas about how God is against us, God is angry with us, God is going to crush us, burn us, torch us, whatever. And Jesus said, ‘No! God is for you. Trust me on this'”

Of course the reason why Rob Bell is doing interviews with interviewers like Paul W. Smith is 1) a mutual friend of both of them set it up (I’m speculating), and 2) Bell’s publicist vetted the interview to insure there would be no theological challenges to the nonsense Bell spews.

An interviewer with a foundation in biblical theology would have pointed out to Bell that he is clearly confusing “common grace” with God’s salvific or saving grace and the text Bell cites is in the part of the sermon on the mount where Jesus is giving moral instruction on loving one’s neighbor – the ones that are easy to love and the ones that are difficult to love – because God gives no distinction in offering blessings which are common to all, though unmerited.

This was a very difficult interview to listen to, not because once again Rob Bell made a fool of himself, but because Bell used one of the finest morning programs in Detroit to propagate his propaganda…and Paul W. Smith stood there like the house by the side of the road.

Listen to the full interview here:

Rob Bell on WJR’s Paul W. Smith in Detroit

Douglas Moo defends the New NIV 2011

I spoke Friday with Dr. Douglas Moo, Blanchard Professor of New Testament at Wheaton and Chair of the Committee on Bible Translation. The focus of our conversation was the controversy surrounding some aspects of the New NIV 2011 as it relates to “gender neutrality.”

I quoted for Dr. Moo from Dr. Albert Mohler’s blog in September of 2009:

“As many of us made clear at the time of the TNIV’s announcement and release, the issues with this translation had to do with translation decisions that we were convinced did not produce “gender accuracy,” but lamentable inaccuracy. The rigorous application of these decisions produced a translation that was not only problematic in terms of direct and indirect gender references, but also in its confusion of crucial texts with messianic significance.”

Dr. Moo’s response:

“The problem, of course, you know, and I think that maybe Al Mohler’s blog is hinting at that, is that he doesn’t think that some of the decisions we made reflect, perhaps, his English.”

The complete audio of our conversation is linked here:

douglas_moo.mp3