|
|
A SCRIPTURAL RESPONSE TO WILLOW CREEK by Paul Edwards ©2004 by Paul Edwards. Reproduction for distribution is prohibited without the express written permission of the author.
From time to time the subject of the "seeker-friendly" church (i.e., Willow Creek/Bill Hybels) is discussed On the Word. There are several churches in our listening area who have adopted the Willow Creek model. This subject produces more email than any other subject we talk about.
Because of the "success" of these mega-churches, people find it difficult to believe that anyone could possibly take issue with them. I mean, after all, aren't these churches effectively reaching people with the gospel of Jesus Christ? Large numbers of people are attracted to these "seeker-friendly" postmodern services every weekend, so if "God is blessing these churches" who are we to argue with their approach? This is PRAGMATISM, not historic CHRISTIANITY.
What follows is the basis of my criticism of the Willow Creek model of ministry.
There are many things about the Willow Creek model that are positive. (We use their "Contagious Christianity" material in our own church's evangelism training, but not uncritically). But the main thrust of Willow Creek's philosophy gives the impression that pragmatism and ultilitarianism are the driving forces behind evangelism. Simply put, this means we must adapt the message of the cross so that it is least offensive to the "seeker" with the result being that large numbers of people will respond. Jesus was very clear that merely because someone was "seeking" Him did not mean that their motives for seeking Him would be honored by Him:
John 2:23-25[ESV]
John 6:26 [ESV]
Luke 13:23,24[ESV]
The Willow Creek model of ministry makes the audience sovereign.1 The elements of the gospel that are perceived to be offensive to the seeker are downplayed or entirely removed ostensibly to remove the stumbling blocks that would prohibit the unchurched from coming to Christ.
WHAT'S MISSING IN THE WILLOW CREEK MODEL? BIBLICAL THEOLOGY!
It is not our marketing strategies that save, but the power of the gospel. It is not our job as believers to make the gospel believable or palatable. It is our job simply to proclaim the gospel. The Holy Spirit makes the gospel attractive to those whom the Father has chosen:
John 6:44 [ESV]
John 10:27-29 [ESV]
1 Corinthians 2:1-5 [ESV]
Historic theology has always taught that it is GOD'S choice of the sinner - not the sinner's choice of God - that makes salvation possible. This is not to say that we do not have a responsibility to choose to be saved. It does, however, mean that we have an INABILITY to choose to be saved unless and until GOD acts first by choosing us. Why? Because we are DEAD in our sins; and DEAD people don't choose! Something must happen PRIOR to your choosing that gives you LIFE so you are then able to call on Jesus for salvation. This something is known in biblical theology as regeneration. Regeneration is solely a work of grace produced by God and is PRIOR TO our calling on God for salvation. Regeneration makes it POSSIBLE for the sinner to call, because prior to regeneration, the sinner IS DEAD. Calling on God for salvation is an EVIDENCE of regneration and is known in theology as CONVERSION. Both REGENERATION and CONVERSION happen as a result of what GOD does, not what MAN does.
Romans 5:6 [ESV]
John 1:11-13 [ESV]
1 John 4:19 [ESV]
The Willow Creek model IGNORES these theological implications of man's inability and the role of the Holy Spirit in producing faith for salvation; it rather seeks to manipulate the emotions to induce a spiritual response to the gospel from those who are yet dead in their sins.4 The result CANNOT be genuine conversion. This theology is, for the most part, MAN-CENTERED (emphasizing our role in salvation and Christian living) rather than GOD-CENTERED (emphasizing God's sovereignty over every area of our lives).
As for the basis for choosing a church, my own view is that a Christian who is committed to developing and growing in their faith must be in a church that is first and foremost BIBLE focused. The preaching IS preaching: an exegesis of a text that seeks to reveal precisely what God is saying, rather than taking a text to support the preconceived conclusions of a "self-help" talk. The philosophy of ministry (HOW the church operates) is developed from the Bible (Acts, 1 & 2 Timothy for starters) and not from the leadership manuals of corporate America. The music used is tempered by the word of God and reflects the word of God, and is not merely chosen because of the emotional effect it produces in the audience. Rather, it reinforces biblical theology through the use of both recently produced praise choruses and historical hymns that are faithful to God's word and to historic Christianity. Also, standards of biblical Christian living are modeled by the leadership and encouraged in the membership (i.e., living lives of Christian distinction from the world).
I want to re-emphasize that the concerns I have with all Willow Creek or "seeker" type churches have to do with the UNCRITICAL use of technology, marketing strategies, and the contemporary methods of church growth. SOME of these things, properly used and in their proper context, can be beneficial. Adopting them without carefully thinking through how their adoption impacts or weakens our biblical theology is what we must be careful of.
If you would like to examine this issue further, I would recommend two books to you: Willow Creek Seeker Services: Evaluating a New Way of Doing Church (Baker Books, 1996) by G. A. Pritchard and Dining With the Devil: The Mega-Church Flirts with Modernity (Baker Books, 1993) by Os Guinness.
1This isn't my opinion - it comes from the man who WROTE the Willow Creek marketing guide! "It is . . . critical that we keep in mind a fundamental principle of Christian communication: the audience, not the message, is sovereign. If our advertising is going to stop people in the midst of hectic schedules and cause them to think about what we're saying, our message has to be adapted to the needs of the audience." [emphasis added] George Barna, Marketing the Church (Colorado Springs: NavPress, 1988), p. 145 2Willow Creek was started in 1975 after Bill Hybels and his friends completed a door-to-door survey asking people why they didn't come to church. As a result, he started Willow Creek as a "church" that would have no cross, little or no mention of sin, an emphasis on "felt needs" rather than holiness, a drama or self-help talk instead of preaching, popular music instead of hymns, and intentionally programming the service so that the audience would never feel guilty. I would say that in order to accomplish all of this they removed all of the offensive elements of the gospel. (see Willow Creek Seeker Services, p. 55) I'm absolutely certain Bill Hybels and the pastors of these seeker churches have good intentions by doing all of this. But by doing these things they UNWITTINGLY (without knowing) remove God from the process. They haven't intentionally left God out, that's just the unintended result. Mike Singletary, former Pro Football player with the Chicago Bears and committed follower of Jesus Christ, was an active member at Willow Creek. Here's what he had to say about Willow Creek downplaying the gospel: "There came a time when it seemed that the emphasis was more on positive mental attitude than on the Word of God, and I became concerned...I was worried because it seemed we were hearing more of a Robert Schuller or a Norman Vincent Peale type of an approach....It bothered me a lot. I told Kim [his wife], 'Something is going to have to happen soon, because I don't care where I am or how much I care for Bill Hybels, if I'm not hearing the Word of God, it's time to go.'" Mike Singletary with Jerry Jenkins, Singletary on Singletary (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1991) p. 106 3One example of the above from Bill Hybels, founding pastor of Willow Creek: "In this community image is a real big deal...When he (unchurched Harry) drives on the campus he is already assessing our corporate image and the effectiveness of our organization before the message has any bearing on his life." [emphasis added] Quoted in Willow Creek Seeker Services, G. A. Pritchard (Grand Rapids: Baker 1996), p. 209 4Willow Creek's programming is intentionally geared toward maniuplating a response from the audience. This has been well documented by G. A. Pritchard through personal interviews with Bill Hybels, Nancy Beach (Director of Programming at WCC) and various other key staff members. Willow Creek Seeker Services, G. A. Pritchard (Grand Rapids: Baker 1996), Chapter 5 and Chapter 7, et al FURTHER READING ONLINE: The links provided below represent a balance between writers who favor and disfavor the Willow Creek approach to evangelism and church growth and do not necessarily reflect my personal views.
|