4 comments to “Ann Arbor church’s efforts to help homeless fail”

  1. Chris | June 1, 2010 | Permalink Reply

    One successful thing I’ve seen in Macomb County (and I’m fairly certain they do the same thing in Oakland), is MCREST, in which churches throughout the county agree to house homeless individuals one week out of the year on a rotating basis. This allows the church and its members to serve, but also allows that service to be staffed by properly-trained professionals who can handle the social monitoring and progress of the residents.

    It works because there are rules. It’s not simply a free place to sleep. Particpants have to be accepted in and must remain drug/alcohol free (there is monitoring upon intake). There is also the expectation that this is a step toward helping people get jobs so they can get on their feet; it’s not simply a place to get out of the rain.

    I think it also works because, while the church MUST be compassionate and minister to those who are homeless, a full-time ministry like the one in Ann Arbor can become a distraction and even a danger to the members of the church–which is who the pastor is first and foremost responsbile for (the members and possibly other auxiliary staff trained for the purpose should take on the servants’ role in that perspective).

    Also, just as we love and accept all of God’s followers, we do not let them stay in sin, but encourage them to grow in repentance and look more like Christ. To model that properly to unbelievers, we would need a homeless ministry that offers shelter and safety, but also the expectation that they need to grow and make steps to live productive lives.

    Just my two cents :-)

  2. Arthur Sido | June 21, 2010 | Permalink Reply

    “They understand from a biblical perspective what the role of deacon is.”

    Interesting since the Bible deals with the qualities to be sought in a deacon but not a thing about specific “roles”. I am not sure how something absent from Scripture can be described as being a “biblical perspective”.

  3. Arthur Sido | July 12, 2010 | Permalink Reply

    What in Acts 6, other than church tradition, would lead you to believe that it is speaking of deacons?

Leave a Reply

Contact Paul